EHRC Homepage | New Category | Your Questions


That is a good question and one which requires an answer. Instead of trying to build the case myself, let me quote from a commentary in the National Review submitted by Carol Iannone. She cites Jerry Coyne, an ecologist and evolutionist from University of Chicago from a review of two books written by authors who think such a conciliation is possible. She titles her comments: "Scientist Admits Scientists Have Been Lying." Then she writes:

"After eviscerating two new books that attempt to show that Darwinism is compatible with religion, Jerry Coyne [...] admits that they are not, and that declarations to the contrary have been "a dirty little secret in scientific circles. It is in our personal and professional interest to proclaim that science and religion are perfectly harmonious." The reason for this unedifying dissembling:

After all, we want our grants funded by the government, and our schoolchildren exposed to real science instead of creationism. Liberal religious people have been important allies in our struggle against creationism, and it is not pleasant to alienate them by declaring how we feel. This is why, as a tactical matter, groups such as the National Academy of Sciences claim that religion and science do not conflict. But their main evidence the existence of religious scientists is wearing thin as scientists grow ever more vociferous about their lack of faith.

Once again, William Jennings Bryan has been proven right. Coyne continues:

Now Darwin Year is upon us, and we can expect more books like those by Kenneth Miller and Karl Giberson. Attempts to reconcile God and evolution keep rolling off the intellectual assembly line. It never stops, because the reconciliation never works.

Remember this when you see a version of Inherit the Wind, with its fradulent implication that the Bible and Darwin are perfectly compatible, and its closing scene with the Clarence Darrow character exiting happily with both in his briefcase. Generations of schoolchildren have been misled by this lie. Now at last we have the truth and can begin again to build on that.

These coments were found at http://phibetacons.nationalreview.com/ for 2/28/2009. Clearly Coyne has spilled the beans. No, as Jerry Coyne has made clear, it is not possible nor is it desirable that evolutionists should seek or pretend to have any common ground with religion. The two are as unlike and incompatible as...well..as oil and water. At least his honesty and clarity are commendable!

______________________________________________________ Ó 2010 Arthur V. Chadwick, Ph.D.